Archive for April, 2010

 
08 04/10

Battery of the Future? MIT Working on Improving Lithium-Air Technology

If you’re not already familiar with lithium-air batteries, you may want to take note. Also known as lithium-oxygen, these batteries are similar to the lithium-ion batteries that now dominate the field of portable electronics. But because lithium-air batteries replace the heavy conventional compounds in such batteries with a carbon-based air electrode and flow of air, the batteries themselves can be much lighter. With the potential of providing energy densities up to three times that of the conventional lithium-ion batteries found in just about every portable consumer electronics device, as well as the incoming wave of electric vehicles, companies from IBM to General Motors are working to develop lithium-air batteries. Most recently, a team of researchers at MIT have made a breakthrough that could help make the commercial development of lightweight rechargeable batteries a reality.

In a paper published this week in the journal Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters, Yang Shao-Horn, an MIT associate professor of mechanical engineering and materials science and engineering, along with some of her students and visiting professor Hubert Gasteiger, reported on a study showing that electrodes with gold or platinum as a catalyst show a much higher level of activity and thus a higher efficiency than simple carbon electrodes in these batteries. In addition, this new work sets the stage for further research that could lead to even better electrode materials, perhaps alloys of gold and platinum or other metals, or metallic oxides, and to less expensive alternatives.

Doctoral student Yi-Chun Lu, lead author of the paper, explains that this team has developed a method for analyzing the activity of different catalysts in the batteries, and now they can build on this research to study a variety of possible materials. “We’ll look at different materials, and look at the trends,” she says. “Such research could allow us to identify the physical parameters that govern the catalyst activity. Ultimately, we will be able to predict the catalyst behaviors.

While some companies working on lithium-air batteries have said they see it as a 10-year development program, Shao-Horn says it is too early to predict how long it may take to reach commercialization. “It’s a very promising area, but there are many science and engineering challenges to be overcome,” she says. “If it truly demonstrates two to three times the energy density” of today’s lithium-ion batteries, she says, the likely first applications will be in portable electronics such as computers and cell phones, which are high-value items, and only later would be applied to vehicles once the costs are reduced.

08 04/10

U.S. Postal Service Looks to Cash In on Battery-Powered Vehicle Revolution

With United States Postal Service desperately looking for ways to increase revenue, a plan to essentially rent out the batteries of what will eventually be a hybrid mail truck fleet for the purpose of storing some of the nation’s grid energy. The plan, being pushed with PJM Interconnection, a regional electricity transmission organization (RTO) that transmits electricity to 13 states and the District of Columbia over 268,5000 squares miles east of the Mississippi River, would allow the mail trucks to generate revenue even when they’re not in use.

“Right now, these fleets are just sitting idle at night,” explains Kenneth Huber, PJM’s advanced technology manager. “Charging those batteries would allow us to store wind energy and also balance load and generation at the right frequency.”

The plan is clearly dependent on the continued development of batter-powered vehicles. As noted on SolveClimate, the Postal Service already has a small number of electric vehicles in its in fleet. Hypothetically, if it replaced its continental fleet of 144,000 mostly fossil-fueled delivery vehicles with battery-powered plug-ins, it could rake in annual payments between $237 million and $378 million from RTOs across the country.

The amount of wind energy currently being produced by PJM far exceeds what they’re able to store, which is the driving force behind their pursuit of alternative energy-storing methods. With that being the case, parking lots full of empty batteries looks might attractive.

“Our storage capacity is at a minimum because we only have access to pumped hydro,” explains Huber, an electrical engineer. Very few industries in PJM’s territory have on-site water supplies for that kind of energy storage, so “that’s why we’re looking at compressed air, flywheels and batteries. The idea of these vehicles being available, that would be ideal.”

02 04/10

Is the ‘Batteries for Electric Vehicles’ Bubble Bound to Burst?

The heavy push widespread adoption of electric vehicles has created a gold-rush of sorts. For a variety of potential benefits that range from reducing greenhouse gas emissions to reducing dependency on foreign oil, governments worldwide have put up billions of dollars for the development of battery-powered vehicles. With battery technology becoming just as, if not more vital to this movement than anything else, existing manufacturers and a whole host of hopeful entrepreneurs have set out reap the rewards. Currently, there are approximately 60 EV lithium-ion battery makers worldwide. As with all bubbles, however, this too will eventually burst in some shape or form. What might the burst of the ‘Batteries for Electric Vehicles’ bubble look like?

According to a report from the German consulting firm Roland Berger, only six or seven of those 60 lithium-ion battery makers will survive the decade. “Manufacturers of lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries currently enjoy a great amount of hype, but massive consolidation is expected to come in the next 5 to 7 years,” says Wolfgang Bernhart, Partner with Roland Berger. “Therefore, only six to eight global battery manufacturers will survive in the next five to seven years,” states Bernhart.

While some say the damage caused by this could easily be as bad as the 2001 tech bubble, the manufacturers that make it through this consolidation period will be in a good position for success. “Unfavorable factors are piling up,” Bernhart continued, “but managed correctly, electrified powertrains will still be a profitable market in the future.”

For these and other key points of information from the Roland Berger report,click here-

-The share of electrified powertrains will increase in all major automotive markets
-Battery costs will decrease significantly in the next 10 years
-Significant overcapacity expected between 2014 and 2017, especially in the US and in Japan
-Only six to eight global battery manufacturers out of approximately 60 will survive the next five to seven years

02 04/10

Is U.S. Falling Behind On Battery Technologies?

Ford CEO Alan Mulally opened the NY Auto Show this morning with a warning that the US is falling behind in the race to develop new battery and powertrain solutions, and only policymakers can change course.

“Governments around the world are going to have a tremendous role to play,” Mulally said.

And with Japan considering a move to be 50 percent hybrid and electric by 2020, for instance, it’s not hard to understand Mulally’s point. Likewise, lithium-ion cell manufacturing is almost non-existent in the US, as is rare earth metal production, and US automakers produce far fewer battery-powered powertrains than the Big 3 of Japan.

Fortunately, despite the warning, Mulally did acknowledge that Ford is “probably better positioned than ever before”.

02 04/10

iPad Reviews: Exceptional Battery Life, Potential Laptop Killer

Just days away from the highly-anticipated release of the Apple iPad, reviews of the device are all over the place. And while Steve Jobs’ latest gadget is being called everything from “absurd” to “the laptop killer”, most seem to agree that the battery life of the iPad will meet and even exceed initial expectations-

Walter S. Mossberg, All Things Digital:

“I was impressed with the iPad’s battery life, which I found to be even longer than Apple’s ten-hour claim, and far longer than on my laptops or smart phones. For my battery test, I played movies, TV shows and other videos back-to-back until the iPad died. This stressed the device’s most power-hogging feature, its screen. The iPad lasted 11 hours and 28 minutes, about 15% more than Apple claimed. I was able to watch four feature-length movies, four TV episodes and a video of a 90-minute corporate presentation, before the battery died midway through an episode of “The Closer.”

David Pogue, New York Times:

“Apple asserts that the iPad runs 10 hours on a charge of its nonremovable battery — but we all know you can’t trust the manufacturer. And sure enough, in my own test, the iPad played movies continuously from 7:30 a.m. to 7:53 p.m. — more than 12 hours. That’s four times as long as a typical laptop or portable DVD player.”

Tim Gideon, PC Magazine:

“The power efficiency of the chip translates to a battery life that Apple rates at “up to ten hours” with Wi-Fi switched on. Our own rundown test of the rechargeable lithium-polymer battery netted a respectably close battery life of 9 hours and 25 minutes.”

As noted, the Apple iPad hits shelves this Saturday.